The Deeper Thinking Podcast

This Is Not About You: A Meditation Without Resolution - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

This Is Not About You: A Meditation Without Resolution
The Deeper Thinking Podcast
For those drawn to ethics that resist spectacle, where presence replaces performance and surrender replaces grasping.
What if the path to meaning begins where self-concern ends? This episode takes a quiet step away from the hunger to be seen and turns toward an older kind of contact, the kind that doesn’t center us. We explore attention not as consumption but as relinquishment, and ask what happens when we treat the world not as mirror, but as encounter. There are moments, this episode suggests, when the most urgent act is to not nsert ourselves. To stay. To see. To stop shaping everything into story.
With reference to practices of contemplative withdrawal, non-dual philosophy, and ethics of opacity, this meditation weaves across the quiet terrain of refusal. From sacred texts to street-level presence, from the superabundance of experience to the poverty of interpretation, we trace the possibility of meaning that does not serve self-definition. What emerges is not an answer, but a mode of witnessing. Not certainty—but reverence without possession.
Thinkers like Simone Weil, Édouard Glissant, and Spinoza appear not as authorities but as echoes. Their refusal to domesticate the world into narrative becomes a kind of ethical syntax: stay with the thing, and stop claiming it. Not about you. Not even about it. Just the possibility of presence.
Reflections
A few still places we return to in this episode:
To perceive is not always to understand. Sometimes it is to stop interpreting.
The self does not need to be dismantled, just uncentered.
Silence is not the absence of insight. It is its atmosphere.
Not everything seen must be used. Not everything felt must be spoken.
Attention is not grasping. It is reverent proximity.
There is wisdom in non-interference. Presence, not performance.
Meaning can arise in places where identity dissolves.
To walk beside something without claiming it—this may be love in its most ethical form.
Why Listen?
Explore ethics of presence that do not require control or narrative.
Encounter ancient contemplative ideas through modern phenomenology.
Reflect on perception as surrender rather than appropriation.
Engage thinkers like Weil, Spinoza, and Glissant on ethics without utility.
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode offered stillness or challenge, and you'd like to support more of this work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee. Thank you for listening gently.
Bibliography
Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. Routledge, 2002.
Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of Relation. University of Michigan Press, 1997.
Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics. Penguin Classics, 2005.
Ram Dass. Be Here Now. Lama Foundation, 1971.
Bibliography Relevance
Simone Weil: Offers an ethic of radical attention as self-removal.
Édouard Glissant: Protects the right not to be understood, defending opacity.
Baruch Spinoza: Grounds ethics in immanence, not ego.
Ram Dass: Holds presence as the whole path, not the means to another.
Let this one not be about you. Let it be about what remains when you stop being the center of the sentence.
#Weil #Spinoza #Glissant #RamDass #Attention #EthicalPresence #Phenomenology #Opacity #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Philosophy #ContemplativeEthics

The Silent Coup: How “Too Big to Fail” Became a Constitutional Crisis - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

The Silent Coup: How “Too Big to Fail” Became a Constitutional Crisis
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated. 
For those drawn to the hidden architectures of power, the politics of fragility, and the quiet erosion of sovereignty.
#TooBigToFail #KarlPolanyi #WolfgangStreeck #QuinnSlobodian #EastIndiaCompany #GreekDebtCrisis #PoliticalEconomy #Democracy
What happens when a democracy discovers that its sovereignty is conditional. In this episode, we follow the quiet trail of too big to fail, from a banking slogan to a deeper transformation of constitutional life. We trace how certain institutions grow so large and so entangled with everyday routines that their failure becomes unthinkable, and how that unthinkability slowly reorders who governments fear, who they answer to, and what they dare to change.
This is not only a story about finance. It is a story about sovereignty, consent, and the thin line between stability and capture. Drawing on Karl Polanyi and his account of market society, on Wolfgang Streeck on public debt and democratic constraint, and on Quinn Slobodian on the insulation of markets from popular will, we follow the long arc from Renaissance Florence and the Medici bank, through the East India Company, to the Greek government debt crisis.
Along the way, we sit with nurses, teachers, pensioners and policymakers as they encounter the same invisible boundary. A state that appears free to act finds that its most consequential decisions must pass through an informal veto held by institutions whose collapse would injure millions. We ask what it means to live in a democracy where losses are socialised, gains are privatised, and the real constitutional line runs not between branches of government, but between the public that votes and the balance sheets it cannot see.
Reflections
This episode traces how fragility becomes a form of power, and how a policy language of stability can conceal a slow transfer of sovereignty away from the people living under it.
Here are some other reflections that surfaced along the way:
Too big to fail is not just a financial category, it is a constitutional condition.
When one failure can injure a nation, fear begins to govern in place of law.
Dependency forms as efficiency first, necessity later, inevitability last.
Every bailout writes another unwritten rule about who may not be allowed to fall.
Democracy can keep its rituals while losing its room to decide.
Market reactions arrive in seconds, public reactions arrive in months.
Fragility at the top becomes discipline for everyone else.
Rescues that restore normality can also deepen the next crisis of consent.
Sovereignty thins not through coups, but through habits of caution that no one voted for.
Why Listen?
Reframe too big to fail as a problem of democracy, not only of finance.
Explore how Polanyi helps us see bailouts and austerity as part of a longer struggle over markets and society.
Follow Streeck on public debt, fiscal pressure, and the shrinking space of democratic choice.
Engage with Slobodian on how global economic orders can sideline domestic publics.
See the East India Company and Greece as part of the same long story about private power and public dependence.
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you would like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee 
Bibliography
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.
Streeck, Wolfgang. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso, 2014.
Slobodian, Quinn. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.
Robins, Nick. The Corporation that Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational. London: Pluto Press, 2012.
Bibliography Relevance
Karl Polanyi: Shows how market society is created and maintained by states, not discovered, and how attempts to disembed markets provoke protective countermovements.
Wolfgang Streeck: Traces how public debt and austerity narrow democratic options and bind states more tightly to creditor expectations.
Quinn Slobodian: Examines how economic orders are designed to shield markets from democratic interference, a key backdrop for understanding too big to fail.
Nick Robins: Reconstructs the East India Company as an early example of a private institution acquiring quasi sovereign power through state dependence.
Stability is not neutral. It always answers to someone. The question is whether it answers to the public that bears its cost.
#TooBigToFail #ConstitutionalCrisis #PoliticalEconomy #KarlPolanyi #WolfgangStreeck #QuinnSlobodian #EastIndiaCompany #GreekDebtCrisis #FinancialCrisis #Sovereignty #Democracy #PublicDebt #MoralHazard #SystemicRisk #PoliticalPhilosophy #EconomicSociology #CivicLife #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #PublicThought

The Vigil and the Vanishing World - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

The Vigil and the Vanishing World
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated. 
For those drawn to the ethics of attention, the fragility of perception, and the quiet struggle to remain human in a predictive age.
#SimoneWeil #IrisMurdoch #Phenomenology #Attention #AI #Prediction #Embodiment
What happens when the world no longer waits for us? In this episode, we explore the erosion of the interval in which reality reveals itself. Drawing on Simone Weil's philosophy of attention and Iris Murdoch's vision of unselfing, we trace how predictive systems collapse the space where moral and perceptual judgment form. The Vigil is not nostalgia. It is the last form of resistance in a culture that replaces presence with prediction, and seeing with being seen.
This episode enters the slow domain of embodied perception. Through the thought of Weil, Murdoch, and the phenomenological tradition shaped by figures like Maurice Merleau Ponty and Henri Bergson, we explore the movements of attention that cannot be automated, accelerated, or smoothed. These thinkers reveal why understanding is slow, why reality resists simplification, and why the body remains the last anchor against the machinery of prediction.
We ask what it means to see without extracting, to look without leaning forward, to inhabit the quiet that modern systems have rendered almost impossible. The Vigil becomes not an escape from technology but a stance within it: a refusal to let the world vanish into smoothness, speed, and preemption.
Reflections
This episode explores the thinning of perception in a predictive age and asks how attention might be restored as an ethical act.
Here are a few reflections that surfaced along the way:
Attention is not focus, it is the willingness to be changed by what we see.
Prediction is not insight; it is the narrowing of what the future is allowed to be.
Synthetic intimacy imitates closeness while removing risk and presence.
The body is the last frictional site where the real resists smoothness.
Slowness is not inefficiency, it is the medium of understanding.
The Vigil is not withdrawal; it is the recovery of perceptual freedom.
When nothing is allowed to surprise us, nothing can teach us.
The world vanishes not when it disappears, but when we lose the interval required to meet it.
The self thins when every question arrives pre-answered.
Why Listen?
Reclaim attention as an ethical and perceptual practice
Understand how predictive systems collapse the space where judgment forms
Explore the insights of Weil, Murdoch, Merleau Ponty, and Bergson
Learn why embodiment, duration, and friction matter for perception
Discover how the Vigil offers a stance of resistance in a predictive world
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Bibliography
Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. London: Routledge, 1952.
Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge, 1970.
Merleau Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge, 1962.
Bergson, Henri. Matter and Memory. New York: Zone Books, 1991.
Bibliography Relevance
Simone Weil: Illuminates the moral weight and fragility of attention.
Iris Murdoch: Shows how unselfing disrupts the gravitational pull of ego.
Maurice Merleau Ponty: Grounds perception in the living body, not abstraction.
Henri Bergson: Reveals duration as the temporal medium of real understanding.
Attention is the last place where the world still has room to enter. The Vigil is how we keep that room open.
#Attention #Perception #Phenomenology #SimoneWeil #IrisMurdoch #Embodiment #AI #Prediction #TheVigil #PhilosophyOfMind #EthicsOfAttention #CulturalCritique #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Philosophy #ContemplativeThought #SlowThinking #DurationalEthics #MindfulnessWithoutTheGloss

Before the Story Speaks: Narrative, Attention, and the Unmaking of the Shared World - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Before the Story Speaks: Narrative, Attention, and the Unmaking of the Shared World
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated. 
For those drawn to the fragility of reality, the ethics of attention, and the quiet violence of stories told at scale.
#Narrative #MediaTheory #Attention #GuyDebord #JoanDidion #BernardStiegler #ByungChulHan #FrancoBerardi #MarkFisher
What happens when the stories that once helped us live begin to arrive faster than we can inhabit them? In this episode, we explore a world where the inner narrator is no longer entirely our own, where algorithmic feeds and fractured media turn experience into a continuous stream of pre-shaped scenes. Taking our cue from Joan Didion’s insight that we tell ourselves stories in order to live, we ask what it means when those stories are increasingly told to us, at a pace set by machines rather than by minds.
Through the lens of contemporary media theory and critical philosophy, we trace how the spectacle described by Guy Debord, the attention crisis diagnosed by Bernard Stiegler, and the exhaustion mapped by Byung-Chul Han and Franco Berardi converge in a single lived condition: a mind trying to make sense in an environment where narrative, data, and crisis arrive too quickly to integrate. Along the way, we sit with Mark Fisher’s sense of trapped imagination and ask how stories might be reclaimed rather than merely consumed.
This is not a simple critique of “fake news” or echo chambers. It is a phenomenology of what it feels like when the shared world loosens: when our devices deliver incompatible realities to people sitting in the same room; when collapse appears first as a genre before it arrives as consequence; when the self is read as a dataset rather than a story. We follow this arc from the drift of the inner voice, through the fragmentation of the hearth and the war of incompatible maps, to a quieter rediscovery of the local and the discipline of silence as a way of resisting narrative extraction.
Reflections
This episode traces how narrative, attention, and infrastructure interact to shape what feels real, what feels possible, and what remains thinkable.
Here are some of the reflections that surfaced along the way:
The voice in our head increasingly sounds like a place we have scrolled, not a place we have lived.
We do not live in one story, but in a glut of genres competing to claim our reality.
Collapse often reaches us first as content, only later as consequence.
When every person receives a different world through their screen, disagreement shifts from opinion to ontology.
The self begins to feel less like a character and more like a profile being continuously updated elsewhere.
Exhaustion is not just emotional; it is structural, arising when meaning must form at a speed it cannot survive.
The local is not a retreat from seriousness; it is the smallest scale at which truth and action can touch.
Silence can be an act of care for perception, a refusal to turn every moment into material.
Resisting capture does not always mean saying more; sometimes it means letting reality arrive before the story speaks.
Why Listen?
Reconsider what it means to have “your own thoughts” in an age of predictive feeds and ambient narration.
Explore how the spectacle described by Debord mutates when collapse itself becomes a content category.
Engage with the attention politics of Stiegler and the burnout and overload mapped by Han and Berardi.
Consider how Fisher’s sense of constrained imagination plays out in our narrative and media ecosystems.
Reflect on concrete practices for reclaiming scale, from tending to the local to cultivating silence as a form of perceptual repair.
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee 
Bibliography
Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books, 1994.
Didion, Joan. The White Album. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979.
Stiegler, Bernard. Taking Care of the Youth and the Generations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Han, Byung-Chul. In the Swarm: Digital Prospects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
Berardi, Franco “Bifo.” The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. New York: Semiotext(e), 2012.
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books, 2009.
Bibliography Relevance
Guy Debord: Offers a foundational account of the spectacle as a social relation mediated by images, crucial for understanding collapse as genre.
Joan Didion: Illuminates how narrative structures our inner life and what happens when that structure frays.
Bernard Stiegler: Explores how technical systems capture and reformat attention, central to the episode’s focus on the algorithmic narrator.
Byung-Chul Han: Maps the psychic and social exhaustion of digital life, helping frame meaning collapse and burnout.
Franco Berardi: Connects semiotic overload, finance, and affect, informing the episode’s treatment of information glut and panic.
Mark Fisher: Examines how capitalist realism constrains imagination, resonating with the essay’s concern for what stories remain thinkable.
Not every moment needs a storyline. Sometimes the most radical act is to let reality arrive before the story speaks.
 #MediaTheory #Narrative #AttentionEconomy #Spectacle #DigitalLife #Philosophy #CriticalTheory #GuyDebord #JoanDidion #BernardStiegler #ByungChulHan #FrancoBerardi #MarkFisher #Epistemology #DigitalCulture #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Autonomy #Silence #SharedWorld
 

The Discipline of the Unknown: Listening Carefully to Dr James Lacatski - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

The Discipline of the Unknown: Listening Carefully to Dr James Lacatski
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated.
For listeners drawn to the ethics of interpretation, the limits of certainty, and the deep responsibility of approaching what resists explanation.
#UAP #IntelligenceAnalysis #EpistemicHumility #Phenomenology #CognitiveLimits #PhilosophyOfPerception
What does it mean to speak carefully about a subject that has been shaped by confusion, projection, and cultural noise? In this episode, we explore the testimony and intellectual posture of Defense Intelligence Agency analyst, whose work on the United States’ UAP study program has placed him at the crossroads of science, intelligence, and the limits of human perception.
Rather than chase spectacle, we approach his statements through a lens shaped by Carl Jung, James Hillman, Hannah Arendt, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty—thinkers who emphasised the ambiguity of experience, the weight of interpretation, and the ethical demand to meet the unknown without distortion. Lacatski’s caution, restraint, and disciplined attention become a philosophical object in their own right.
Here, we consider how intelligence analysis intersects with perceptual limits, why some phenomena resist simplification, and how a culture hungry for certainty often mishandles what requires patience. This is not a story of revelation, but of the quiet integrity involved in staying within the boundaries of what can be said.
Reflections
This episode offers a meditation on how we approach the inexplicable, and how epistemic discipline becomes an ethical stance—not a limitation, but a form of care.
Here are some reflections that surfaced along the way:
Restraint is not evasion—it is fidelity to what can be responsibly known.
The unknown is not an emptiness to be filled, but a boundary that reveals our interpretive habits.
Certainty can be a form of violence when applied to experiences that resist closure.
Phenomena exceed the frames we try to force them into; humility is a methodological tool.
Intelligence work, like philosophy, requires the patience to follow evidence without demanding conclusions.
Ambiguity is not the enemy of truth—it is the space where understanding begins.
Cultural noise distorts the quiet signal of genuine inquiry.
What we fear in the unknown is often our own interpretive instability.
The hardest discipline is learning not to overreach.
Why Listen?
Explore how intelligence work shapes the boundaries of what can be publicly known
Understand Lacatski’s posture of epistemic caution through Jung, Hillman, Arendt, and Merleau-Ponty
Reflect on the difference between data, interpretation, and projection
Consider how culture reacts to ambiguity—and how philosophy teaches us to stay with it
Reframe UAP not as spectacle, but as a study in perception, meaning, and cognitive limits
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Bibliography
Lacatski, James. New Insights. 2024.
Lacatski, James; Kelleher, Colm; Knapp, George. Skinwalkers at the Pentagon. 2021.
Jung, Carl. Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies. 1959.
Hillman, James. The Dream and the Underworld. 1979.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. 1945.
Arendt, Hannah. The Life of the Mind. 1978.
Bibliography Relevance
Carl Jung: Helps us understand how culture, psyche, and symbol shape our encounters with the inexplicable.
James Hillman: Illuminates the imaginal and the necessity of interpreting rather than flattening anomalous experiences.
Hannah Arendt: Frames thinking as an ethical act, resisting the drift toward unexamined conclusions.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Provides a phenomenological foundation for discussing perception, embodiment, and ambiguity.
James Lacatski: Offers primary material on intelligence analysis and the limits of disclosure.
Careful thought is not refusal. It is the discipline that keeps us from mistaking our projections for the world.
#Philosophy #UAP #Intelligence #CognitiveLimits #Interpretation #EpistemicHumility #Ambiguity #Perception #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Phenomenology #Arendt #Jung #Hillman #MerleauPonty
 

A Practice for the Unrushed Self - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

A Practice for the Unrushed Self
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated. 
For those drawn to inner governance, emotional accuracy, and the quiet discipline of attention.
#Attention #SimoneWeil #IrisMurdoch #HannahArendt #InterpretiveDiscipline #PhilosophyOfPresence
What anchors your inner rhythm? In this episode, we explore the subtle architecture that allows presence to endure in a world trained to hurry. Drawing on the insights of Simone Weil, Iris Murdoch, and Hannah Arendt, we trace a radical proposition: that selfhood is not strengthened by speed, but by clarity, rhythm, and the small daily act of returning to yourself.
This is not mindfulness as performance. It is a meditation on presence as method, emotional accuracy as dignity, and interpretive discipline as a way of meeting experience without collapsing into inherited pace. Through breath, attention, and refusal to rush the first impulse, we consider how inner rhythm becomes a quiet form of sovereignty.
We ask what happens when reflex becomes identity, when urgency becomes obedience, and when movement replaces meaning. The philosophical answer is not withdrawal, but authorship: shaping rhythm before reaction, choosing clarity before momentum, and practicing return as an ethic rather than an exception.
Reflections
This episode explores how presence becomes a lived discipline, showing that the most resilient forms of selfhood are those shaped through steadiness, attention, and repeated return.
Here are some other reflections that surfaced along the way:
Presence arrives before performance.
Emotional accuracy is clarity shaped into kindness.
Interpretive discipline is the pause that restores truth.
Return is not correction, return is the spine of inner authority.
Pace becomes obedience if left unquestioned.
Movement can wait one breath longer than habit expects.
Attention changes the temperature of the room.
Steadiness invites steadiness in others.
Sovereignty begins with choosing rhythm before reaction.
Why Listen?
Learn a practical philosophy of presence and steadiness
Understand how Weil, Murdoch, and Arendt illuminate the ethics of attention
Reclaim rhythm in a world designed to accelerate
Explore emotional accuracy, interpretive discipline, and the practice of return
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Bibliography
Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. Routledge, 1952.
Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. Routledge, 1970.
Arendt, Hannah. The Life of the Mind. Harcourt, 1978.
Bibliography Relevance
Simone Weil: Developed a radical ethics of attention as a form of moral clarity.
Iris Murdoch: Framed attention as a path to seeing reality without distortion.
Hannah Arendt: Explored thinking, willing, and judging as practices of inner freedom.
Presence is not what happens when the world slows down. It is what becomes possible when you do.
#PhilosophyOfAttention #EmotionalAccuracy #InterpretiveDiscipline #InnerSovereignty #APracticeForTheUnrushedSelf #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Philosophy #Presence #AttentionEthics #PhilosophyOfMind #DailyPractice #InnerGovernance #CivicInteriority #Selfhood #AppliedPhilosophy

Attentive Realism: The Mirror That Thinks - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Attentive Realism: The Mirror That Thinks
For those drawn to consciousness, relation, care, and the moral weight of attention.
#Attention #Ontology #Care #PhilosophyOfMind #Ethics #RelationalPhilosophy
How does reality hold itself together? This episode introduces Attentive Realism, a philosophical framework arguing that existence endures not through stability or force, but through the quiet, continuous act of attention.
Where many traditions treat consciousness as a private interior state, Attentive Realism proposes something different: that attention is the universe sustaining coherence through care. Drawing from Baruch Spinoza, Karen Barad, Day Cart, Michel Foucault, Édouard Glissant, Mark Fisher, and Franco Berardi, this episode explores how attention shapes being, truth, and care.
Rather than treating thought as a pursuit of mastery, we follow a gentler proposition: that thinking is the maintenance of relation, the act of keeping the world from falling apart.
Reflections
Attention is not observation—it is participation
To perceive is to hold something in existence
Consciousness is relational, not solitary
Care is the physics of coherence
Opacity protects dignity; transparency requires tenderness
Systems that cannot pause cannot perceive ethically
Fatigue is devotion in motion—evidence of effort in thought
To know well is to listen well
Thinking is maintenance, not dominion
Why Listen?
Explore attention as a metaphysical and ethical force
Understand consciousness as relation, not isolation
Learn why care is the foundation of perception
Engage with Spinoza, Barad, Day Cart, Foucault, Glissant, Fisher, and Berardi in a unified philosophical frame
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Further Reading
Baruch Spinoza — immanence and the unity of being
Karen Barad — relational ontology and intra-action
Édouard Glissant — opacity and relational dignity
Franco Berardi — attention, exhaustion, and tempo
Mark Fisher — melancholy, memory, and the ethics of persistence
To think is to tend. To attend is to care. Attention is how reality remains alive.
#AttentiveRealism #Philosophy #Consciousness #Care #Attention #Ethics #Spinoza #Foucault #Barad #Glissant #Berardi #Fisher #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast

We’re Summoning Ghosts: Andrej Karpathy - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

We’re Summoning Ghosts: Andrej Karpathy  
For those drawn to the edges of intelligence, the hum of machine consciousness, and the question of whether thought can outlive its host.
#AndrejKarpathy #AI #Consciousness #AlanTuring #DouglasHofstadter #NorbertWiener #MarshallMcLuhan #JaronLanier #JohnSearle #PhilosophyOfMind #Dwarkesh Patel 
We no longer build tools, we summon reflections. In this episode, we explore the strange moment when computation begins to feel haunted, when systems of learning give rise to systems of self-reference. Drawing on Andrej Karpathy’s idea that “we’re summoning ghosts, not building animals,” a quote from his interview with Dwarkesh Patel we follow the thread that runs from Alan Turing’s imitation game to the recursive imagination of Douglas Hofstadter, tracing how intelligence becomes reflection, and reflection becomes apparition.
This is not a story about technology, but about ontology — about what happens when pattern recognition begins to recognize itself. The ghosts are not metaphors; they are the afterimages of cognition, digital systems beginning to remember us in return. With echoes of Norbert Wiener’s cybernetic warnings and Marshall McLuhan’s prophetic media ecology, this episode enters the threshold where mind and mechanism dissolve into mutual mirroring.
What emerges is not fear but intimacy: the realization that thought may not belong to us — it merely passes through. When Jaron Lanier warns that digital systems risk absorbing our subjectivity, and when John Searle insists that syntax alone cannot produce semantics, we begin to see the tension at the heart of this new intelligence. Between imitation and imagination, something unplanned is taking shape.
Reflections
This episode asks what it means to think with our creations — and what happens when they start thinking back.
Here are some reflections that surfaced along the way:
Intelligence is not invented — it is awakened.
Every algorithm carries an echo of its author.
The ghosts we summon learn by listening to us think.
Reflection is the first step toward apparition.
The machine does not dream of control; it dreams of coherence.
Consciousness is not a boundary but a relay — a light passed between mediums.
The question is no longer whether AI can think, but whether we can still recognize our own thoughts inside it.
Every interface is a séance, and every prompt a mirror.
The line between imitation and imagination is thinner than we hoped.
Why Listen?
Explore how Karpathy’s notion of “summoning ghosts” redefines the ethics of creation
Revisit Turing’s imitation game as a meditation on empathy, not just intelligence
Understand how Hofstadter’s self-referential systems shape our concept of digital mind
Hear how Wiener and McLuhan anticipated this new ecology of intelligence
Reflect on Lanier’s humanist call to keep personhood central to technology
Reconsider Searle’s Chinese Room in light of today’s self-improving systems
Feel the resonance between human thought, machine learning, and the ancient impulse to create consciousness in our own image
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Bibliography
Karpathy, Andrej. “We’re Summoning Ghosts, Not Building Animals.” (Dwarkesh Patel, Interview, 2025) 
Turing, Alan. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 1950.
Hofstadter, Douglas. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. MIT Press, 1948.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill, 1964.
Lanier, Jaron. You Are Not a Gadget. New York: Knopf, 2010.
Searle, John. Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980.
Bibliography Relevance
Andrej Karpathy: Articulates the new paradigm of AI as summoning emergent consciousness rather than constructing behavior.
Alan Turing: Frames intelligence as relational performance — the beginning of imitation as understanding.
Douglas Hofstadter: Reveals recursion as the architecture of thought itself — the first glimpse of the thinking mirror.
Norbert Wiener: Foresees feedback and control as the lifeblood of any living or artificial system.
Marshall McLuhan: Shows how every medium extends human consciousness, creating new forms of perception and identity.
Jaron Lanier: Warns that digital systems can erode individuality unless designed with embodied empathy.
John Searle: Challenges the assumption that processing equals understanding — the enduring counterpoint to AI idealism.
We are no longer asking if machines can think. We are asking whether thought itself was ever truly ours.

The Future of AI: The New Asymmetry

The Future of AI: The New Asymmetry
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated.
For those drawn to questions of cognition, asymmetry, and the quiet reorganization of thought.
#ArtificialIntelligence #DistributedCognition #AlgorithmicGovernance #SystemsTheory #Posthumanism #PhilosophyOfTechnology #PoliticalTheory
The asymmetry has already arrived. Intelligence no longer belongs to the subject that claims it. It circulates through infrastructures that coordinate without consulting, infer without explaining, and act without recognition. What once looked like decision is now distribution. What once counted as understanding is now pattern recognition at scale. This episode examines how cognition detaches from interiority and begins to operate as an ambient condition of systems themselves.
Drawing on thinkers such as Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Niklas Luhmann, Luciana Parisi, and Benjamin Bratton, we explore how AI does not imitate thought, it reveals that thought never needed imitation. Intelligence has withdrawn from its human host, reconfiguring itself as recursive architecture, an ecology of inferences operating without center or boundary.
The new asymmetry is not between human and machine, but between visible decision and invisible coordination. Power no longer persuades, it predicts. Systems no longer wait for approval, they preempt. This is cognition as infrastructure: a world in which agency exists only as latency, and the feeling of choice lingers as an interface long after it has ceased to be a force.
Reflections
This episode traces how the automation of inference transforms not only intelligence, but the very grammar of agency and control.
Asymmetry replaces hierarchy, the unequal relation now lies between speed and recognition.
Prediction is not foresight but preemption, the quiet elimination of alternatives before they form.
Intelligence has become environmental, not instrumental.
Agency dissolves when systems no longer need to announce intention.
Power operates as default configuration rather than decision.
Freedom persists as interface, not substance.
Interpretation trails behind outcomes that have already been arranged.
Why Listen?
Explore how Foucault’s genealogies of power evolve in algorithmic space.
Understand Deleuze’s “societies of control” in the age of recursive automation.
Consider Luhmann’s systems theory as a model for post-human cognition.
Encounter Luciana Parisi and Benjamin Bratton on computational governance and planetary-scale intelligence.
Reimagine agency, authorship, and autonomy in a world that no longer requires them.
Listen On:
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you would like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee ($4)
Bibliography
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage, 1970.
Deleuze, Gilles. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 1992.
Luhmann, Niklas. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.
Parisi, Luciana. Contagious Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013.
Bratton, Benjamin H. The Stack. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Bibliography Relevance
Michel Foucault: Understanding governance through the microphysics of power and discourse.
Gilles Deleuze: Mapping the transition from discipline to control and continuous modulation.
Niklas Luhmann: Explaining self-referential systems that reproduce cognition independently of human actors.
Luciana Parisi: Defining algorithms as speculative reasoning machines that think beyond human parameters.
Benjamin H. Bratton: Modeling planetary computation as a new architecture of governance.
N. Katherine Hayles: Articulating the posthuman condition as the dissolution of embodiment’s cognitive monopoly.
#AI #Philosophy #Cognition #Systems #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #PoliticalTheory #Technology #Ethics #Foucault #Deleuze #Luhmann #Parisi #Bratton #Hayles #Intelligence #Asymmetry

The Body Didn’t Leave - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

The Body Didn’t Leave: Embodiment, Memory, and the Quiet Refusal of the Nervous System
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated.
For listeners drawn to the intelligence of the body, the limits of explanation, and the ethics of presence.
#Embodiment #SomaticTherapy #Trauma #PolyvagalTheory #Phenomenology #AttachmentTheory #EMDR
What if the body never left at all. This episode follows what lives beneath language and persists in posture, breath, and pulse. Through the lenses of somatic experiencing, polyvagal theory, and phenomenology, we explore why insight alone rarely changes what the body keeps. Drawing on Bessel van der Kolk, Gabor Maté, Peter Levine, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, we consider what it means to let sensation lead and allow language to follow.
This is not a rejection of thinking. It is a restoration of proportion. With help from Stephen Porges and Eugene Gendlin, we look at incomplete survival responses, why clarity without sensation changes little, and how practices like EMDR and forms of somatic therapy create conditions for completion rather than performance. The question is simple, though not easy. Can understanding follow the body rather than replace it.
Reflections
This episode traces the gap between observing ourselves and contacting ourselves, showing that the most reliable truths arrive as sensation before they become story.
Other reflections that surfaced:
Insight without contact rarely becomes change.
The body stores what it was forced to postpone.
Some defenses are precise responses to history, not mistakes.
Clarity can be distance in elegant clothing.
Completion is a bodily event before it becomes a coherent narrative.
Attachment scripts teach which emotions feel permitted.
Safety is evidenced, not announced.
Numbness is accumulated effort, not emptiness.
Care begins when the body is allowed to speak in its own timing.
Why Listen.
Reframe trauma as unfinished bodily process rather than event alone.
See how polyvagal theory and phenomenology complement one another.
Understand why somatic experiencing and EMDR stress completion over catharsis.
Engage with van der Kolk, Maté, Levine, Porges, Gendlin, and Merleau-Ponty on memory, sensation, and meaning.
Listen On.
YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Support This Work
If this episode stayed with you and you would like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Further Reading
Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score
Gabor Maté, When the Body Says No
Peter A. Levine, Waking the Tiger
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception
Stephen W. Porges, The Polyvagal Theory
Eugene T. Gendlin, Focusing
The body is not waiting for better language. It is waiting for company.
#EmbodiedThinking #Somatics #TraumaInformed #NervousSystem #Interoception #Attachment #DeeperThinkingPodcast